← Back to feed
S
Sam L@sjlufi
Score: 81 · Intermediate

Flick Tutorials are somewhat inconsistent in content and format

EntertainmentTechnologyGamesEducation

It is not immediately clear to me which flicks are contested and how based on the Flick tutorials. I attempted to find the FAQ page from when I was first perusing/signing up, but it is not clear to me on how to navigate to that page to see if it contains a summary.

In any event, it might be helpful as an enhancement to have a quick reference page of all flicks indicating which can be contested and which go immediately to jury. Alternatively, perhaps each Flick tutorial could have a quick reference box outlining the ground for contesting (if possible) or if the Flicker is able to retract. In any event, the format should be streamlined so that the basis of contestation (I don't know if this is a word) can be clearly referenced.

An example:
Loaded Question Flick has a heading "Contesting the flick: the established-premise defence"
False Information Tutorial does not have a heading for contesting but does have a header reading "The 500-character analysis." It could be revised to match the format: "Contesting the flick: the 500-character analysis" or something.

Sign in to join the conversation.